Futures: Polak Game

The Polak Game: Exploring the Future

A step-by-step guide to using The Polak Game

Our Futures practice at Hopelab is one way we explore a core question in our work: how do young people relate to the future, and how powerful do they feel in shaping it? As we’ve begun to build Hopelab Futures, we’ve looked for simple, experiential methods that any partner can use to surface assumptions about hope and agency; one of our favorite starting points is “The Polak Game,” a classic futures exercise that maps people’s views of the future along two axes: optimism and influence.

Why we use the Polak Game

The Polak Game was originally developed from futurist Fred Polak’s work The Image of the Future, later adapted by practitioners like Peter Hayward and Stuart Candy (Journal of Futures Studies, December 2017, 22(2): 5–14), to surface how people see the future and their ability to influence it. It uses a simple 2×2 matrix: one axis tracks whether people expect the future to get better or worse, and the other captures whether they feel they can affect that future.

At Hopelab, this game has become a lightweight way to open futures conversations with young leaders, partners, and curious friends, especially in the context of youth mental health and social change work. It gives us a shared, visual snapshot of how hopeful people are feeling and how much agency they sense, which matters deeply when we’re imagining new possibilities together.

We’ve run a digital version of this activity with young leaders in our network and with our full staff as an opener to deeper futures conversations. Below is a ready-to-use version of the Digital Polak Game that external partners, collaborators, and teams can adapt and run on their own as part of strategy, futures, or reflection sessions.

Digital Polak Game

The activity is commonly run in 30–60 minutes and works well as an opening exercise for futures, strategy, or reflection sessions.

Use a shared 2×2 board where participants place their names or a dot based on two questions: how they feel about the future, and how much influence they believe people like them have to shape it. The vertical axis represents whether the future feels better or worse, and the horizontal axis represents lower to higher agency.

1. Prepare the board

Set up one shared slide or one Mural board with a large 2×2 matrix. Label the axes in a clear, simple way: top = “more hopeful / getting better,” bottom = “less hopeful / getting worse,” left = “less influence,” and right = “more influence.”

Create one movable marker for each participant using a sticky note, text box, or small shape with their name on it. Keep the board visually simple so people can focus on placement rather than design details. You can make a copy of this simple Google Slides board and invite people to move a dot to their desired quadrant.

2. Introduce the activity

Use this script:

“We’re going to do a quick mapping activity to surface how each of us is relating to the future right now.”
“This is not about right or wrong answers. It’s about noticing different assumptions, moods, and levels of agency in the group.”
“You’ll place your name on the grid based on two questions: first, whether you think the future is moving in a better or worse direction; second, how much influence you think people like you have to shape that future.”
Before people move, define the frame. For example: “Think about our field over the next five years,” or “Think about the world over the next ten years.” A shared timeframe helps people respond to the same question.

3. Invite placement

Use this script:

“First, place your name higher or lower on the board depending on how you’re feeling about the future in this timeframe.”
“Higher means you see the future trending better overall. Lower means you see it trending worse overall.”
“Then move left or right based on how much influence you think people like you have to shape that future.”
“Right means more influence. Left means less influence.”
Give people a minute or two to place themselves silently. Once everyone is in position, pause before discussion so the group can take in the overall pattern.

4. Debrief the map

Start with observation before interpretation. Ask:

“What do you notice?”
“Where do you see clusters?”
“Which parts of the map are empty or nearly empty?”
“What surprises you?”
Then move into personal reflection:
“Why did you place yourself where you did?”
“What experiences or beliefs are shaping your position?”
“What would need to change for you to move in a different direction?”

5. Deepen the conversation

If useful, invite participants to consider voices not represented in the room. This helps the group think beyond its own internal assumptions and notice who may experience the future differently.

You can ask:

“Where do you think our stakeholders or community members might place themselves?”
“Whose perspective is missing from this map?”
“What does this distribution suggest about how we approach change or possibility together?”

6. Close the activity

End with a brief reflection that connects the exercise back to the session. You can say:

“This map doesn’t tell us who is correct. It gives us a picture of how this group is currently relating to the future.”
“That matters, because our expectations and our sense of agency shape how we plan, act, and imagine what is possible.”

If you want, invite people to move their marker one final time after discussion if their thinking has shifted. That can make changes in perspective visible to the group.

Platform notes

For Google Slides, use one slide with locked axis labels in the background and a pre-made shape for each participant to drag. This is best for smaller groups or lower-tech sessions where simplicity matters most.

For Mural, use sticky notes with participant names and leave extra space around the 2×2 for comments, reflections, or follow-up prompts. This works especially well if you want a richer debrief or want participants to annotate why they chose their position.

Axis language

If you want cleaner wording for the board itself, use:

Top: “Future looks better”
Bottom: “Future looks worse”
Left: “Less ability to influence”
Right: “More ability to influence”

Or a slightly warmer version:

Top: “More hopeful”
Bottom: “Less hopeful”
Left: “Less agency”
Right: “More agency”

Give it a try!

If you used this game with your team, we’d love to hear about your experience and what you uncovered. Email us anytime at futures@hopelab.org