An Identity Affirming Web App to Help Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Cope with Minority Stress: Pilot Randomized Control Trial

Jose Bauermeister; Seul Ki Choi; Emma Bruehlman-Senecal; Jesse Golinkoff; Arianna Taboada; Joshua Lavra; Lionel Ramazzini; Fred Dillon; Jana Haritatos

Abstract

Background: Efficacious mental health interventions for sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) have had limited reach given their delivery as time-intensive, in-person sessions. Internet-based interventions may facilitate reach to SGMY, yet there is little research examining their efficacy.

Objective: We describe the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial of imi, a web app designed to improve mental health by supporting LGBTQ+ identity affirmation, coping self-efficacy, and coping skill practice.

Methods: SGMY(N=270) living in the US, ages 13 to 19 (Mean 16.5, SD 1.5 years) were recruited through Instagram ads. Nearly 78% of the sample identified as a racial and/or ethnic minority. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the full imi intervention web app (treatment, n=135) or a resource page-only version of the imi site (control, n=135). imi covered four topical areas: gender identity, LGBTQ+ identity, stress and coping, and internalized homophobia and transphobia. Participants explored these areas by engaging with informational resources, interactive exercises, and peer stories at a self-guided pace. Both arms were assessed via web-based surveys at baseline and 4-week follow-up for intervention satisfaction, stress appraisals (i.e., challenge, threat, resource), coping skills (i.e., instrumental support, positive reframing, planning), and mental health symptoms, among other outcomes. Main ‘intent-to-treat’ analyses compared the arms at week 4, controlling for baseline values on each outcome.

Results: Survey retention was 90% at week 4. Participants in the treatment arm reported greater satisfaction with the intervention than participants in the control arm (t241=-2.98; p=.003). The treatment arm showed significantly greater improvement in challenge appraisals (i.e., belief in one’s coping abilities) than the control (Cohen d=0.26; p=.008). There were no differences between the arms for threat (d=0.10; p=.37) or resource (d=0.15; p=.14) appraisals. The treatment arm showed greater increases in coping skills than the control arm (instrumental support: d=0.24, p=.005; positive reframing: d=0.27, p=.02; planning: d=0.26, p=.02). Mental health symptoms improved across both the treatment and control arms; however, there were no differences between arms. Within the treatment arm, higher engagement with imi (>=5 sessions, >10 minutes, or >10 pages) predicted greater improvement in stress appraisals (all ps<.05).

Conclusions: Results provide initial evidence that asynchronous psychosocial interventions delivered via a web app to SGMY can support their ability to cope with minority stress. Further research is needed to examine the long-term effects of imi. Clinical Trial: Clinical Trials.gov NCT05061966; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05061966

Read the study

Read the full study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) or read a summary prepared by our research team.

Gold Anthem Award

In 2023, the Eidos LGBTQ+ Health Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania was recognized by the Anthem Awards in the Health category for Research Projects or Publications / Awareness & Media.

 


Related Content

View all Research

A study from Hopelab, in collaboration with media psychology expert Dr. Bradley Bond, provides a nuanced understanding of how unique online connections with media figures, such as social media content creators, contribute to the positive experiences, community connection, and identity development for Queer young people.

This research looks at how teens and young people are embracing online mental health tools — from social media to therapy and mental health apps — as resources for seeking support and managing their own mental health and well-being.

This study examines generative AI use by race and ethnicity, age, gender, and LGBTQ+ identity and shares a nuanced understanding of how different demographic groups perceive and interact with generative AI technologies. Young people were directly involved in the creation of survey topics and questions and the interpretation of results.

This study shows that while social media continues to pose risks, it also plays a beneficial role in supporting the mental health and well-being of young people — especially those from marginalized communities.